November 03, 2006

The Starbucks Test: My Idea!

I have a claim to make. Here it is.

Almost two years ago I wrote a post I called That Starbucks Feeling that contained my two Starbucks observations. The first isn't the issue here. But here's the second:

There is an almost perfectly indirect relationship between the complexity of someone's coffee order at Starbucks and how much power they feel they have in the world at the moment they make the order.

I am beginning to believe, with nothing but anecdotal evidence, that the great allure of Starbucks for so many is the implicit notion that we can make the barista do whatever we want with that espresso machine and paper cup. The more complex our order, the more we're exercising ourselves, our frustration, our sense of injustice that we're not more recognized in the world, our sense of entitlement.

Ergo, the downtrodden middle manager or office drone orders up the venti, no-whip, half decaf, extra shot, long, dry, non-fat, extra-hot latte, with a twist of lemon. (Nod to Steve Martin, L.A. Story)

Does this jive with your experience of the coffee-ordering process at Starbucks? The complexity of the ordering is vindication and motivation at once for those not receiving their rightful respect / love / money / fawning / etc.

Then tonight I came across (through a roundabout, interlinked path that incorporated the Joyent blog and Guy Kawasaki's review) a book called The No Asshole Rule by Bob Sutton.

As part of the No Assholes Rule book promotion Mr. Sutton has created The Starbucks Test.

New Rule: The more complicated the Starbucks order, the bigger the asshole. If you walk into a Starbucks and order a "decaf grande half-soy, half-low fat, iced vanilla, double-shot, gingerbread cappuccino, extra dry, light ice, with one Sweet-n'-Low and one NutraSweet," ooh, you're a huge asshole.

!

But the rip off and my indignant outrage don't end there!

Mr. Sutton mentions George Carlin as a mistaken origin for the idea, then says that Snopes' New Rules for 2006 attributes the idea to Bill Maher. Bill Maher! The crook!

Check the dates. I posted That Starbucks Feeling back in January 2005!

Lordy. Do the lies and rip off artists, the cons and sham smarties out there have an end? Is there no limit to the depths these people will stoop to?

I don't know. (shaking head)

I just don't know.

Buy my book.

Posted by James Sherrett at November 3, 2006 06:46 PM
Comments

So what does it mean when I walk into Tim Horton's and ask for my coffee black? They always look at me a little cockeyed because I don't want milk, cream, or sugar in there.

More than a few times, I'll walk out of there with one of those in my coffee anyway. They just can't help themselves. It can't be black. I don't think it's within their ability to leave it alone sometimes.

Posted by: John Bollwitt at November 4, 2006 10:43 AM

I don't go to Starbucks. Does that mean I have a Mother Teresa Complex?

Posted by: Anne at November 5, 2006 02:04 PM

Perhaps we should start measuring likeability as it relates to the number of black ink marks a barista is required to sketch on your Starbucks cup to complete the order.

Posted by: Jordan at November 6, 2006 12:06 PM

John: I think it means you're very low maintenance. I like black coffee too. Do we need a support group?

Anne: you're asking?

Jordan: each ink mark a strike against their character?

Posted by: James at November 6, 2006 02:51 PM

You got it, James.

You black coffee guys are at one end of the spectrum; the kind of people one wouldn't mind being seated next to on a plane.

On this new scale, you can assume someone's L-factor is significantly lower if they insist instead on a tall, 3/4 full, extra hot, half-caff Americano.

Posted by: Jordan at November 6, 2006 05:21 PM